infra god · AWS · Azure · GCP

deplovox

Deploy to a cloud you own — verified, not guessed

infra god turns a plain-English description into a grounded, independently-verified deployment plan for your own AWS, Azure, or GCP account — cited to the cloud's own docs and checked before you ever see it. Not a walled garden. Not a chatbot guess.

1 free run per day · no signup

Not a host. Not a chatbot.

deplovox plans infrastructure you own and can verify — the harder, more honest problem. That's the point, not a footnote.

Your own cloud, not a walled garden

The plan deploys to your AWS, Azure, or GCP account. You own the infrastructure and the bill — there's no deplovox runtime to lock into, and nothing to migrate off later.

Verified, not guessed

Grounded in the cloud's own docs and cited, then checked by real tools — `terraform validate` with pinned providers, checkov + tflint scanning, and a deterministic zero-dangling-reference check — before you ever see it.

Cloud-neutral by design

One description maps to AWS, Azure, or GCP, grounded in each cloud's own idiomatic services — not a lowest-common-denominator template, and not a bet on a single vendor.

A confidence read, not a guess

Every plan leads with a computed confidence read — architecture, IaC completeness, and deployability, plus how much manual work is left — derived from its own validation checks. Honest precisely because it isn't always 100%.

Moving off Vercel, Heroku, or Render?

Take your app to infrastructure you own — same app, a cloud account you control. See how each maps to a real, verified deployment build.

Describe your app. Get infrastructure you can actually trust.

deplovox turns a plain-English description of your app into deploy-ready infrastructure-as-code for your own AWS, Azure, or GCP account — Terraform or CloudFormation. What makes it different isn't that it can generate IaC (anything can). It's that deplovox tells you, honestly and precisely, how much to trust what it just gave you — and refuses to dress up a guess as a guarantee.

Two roads, and we always tell you which one you're on.

The verified builder · the golden path

For the app shapes deplovox knows — a web service and a database, a multi-service app, one with a CDN, a custom domain, or user login — it doesn't write infrastructure from scratch. It assembles it from battle-tested, independently-verified building blocks, checks the result against structural rules (database is private, secrets are referenced not hardcoded, load balancing is wired correctly), prices it against dated cloud pricing, and cites the official docs behind each decision. The result is deploy-ready, deterministic, and costs a fraction of a cent. This path covers the large majority of common app shapes.

The AI path · the honest fallback

For an unusual shape it doesn't have a verified recipe for, deplovox asks a frontier AI model to generate the infrastructure — and then does something most tools don't: it repairs and labels that output before you see it. Every AI-generated result is clearly stamped “AI-generated · unverified · review before deploy,” and its confidence score is attributed to the AI, not to a deplovox verification. You are never handed a guess disguised as a sure thing.

The repair layer.

When the AI writes infrastructure, deplovox runs a deterministic repair pass over it first. It reads the infrastructure as a graph of resources — not as text — so the same checks work across Terraform and CloudFormation. Where it finds a fixable mistake (a CDN certificate in the wrong region, a container tag set to mutable, an invalid resource property), it fixes it automatically. Where a mistake can't be fixed safely — like narrowing an over-broad permission, or a DNS zone only you can provide — it does not guess; it flags it clearly for you to resolve.

It can never make it worse

Each fix is applied on a copy and kept only if it strictly removes the problem without introducing a new one. This is proven exhaustively, not assumed.

It never invents

deplovox fixes what it can prove and honestly flags the rest — it will not fabricate a value it doesn't have.

The point isn't a perfect answer every time. It's an honestone — verified where we can prove it, repaired where we safely can, and clearly labeled everywhere else. That's infrastructure you can act on with your eyes open.

The same request, two ways — and why you can depend on either.

The request

“A Next.js web app with a Node API and a background worker, a Postgres database and Redis cache, on a custom domain behind a CDN, with user login. Deploy it to my AWS account.”

Verified

Verified builder · Terraform

Assembled from tested modules: multi-service ALB routing, per-service ECS, a CDN, a custom-domain certificate in the correct region, Cognito login, and a private database.

Deploy-ready · reconciliation passed · cited to official docs · cost floor computed.

~3.6s · ~$0.006

“Built from parts we've already verified — you can deploy this.”

AI-generated · unverified

AI path (an unusual shape), repaired + labeled

The AI generated the template; deplovox's repair pass then auto-fixed the fixable faults (moved the CDN certificate to the required region, corrected an invalid resource property) and flagged the ones only you can resolve (your DNS hosted zone).

Auto-repaired · never-worse guaranteed · honestly labeled · review before deploy.

“A guess — but a repaired, clearly-labeled one. You always know what you're holding.”

Why this is more dependable

Verified by default
The builder covers the majority of common app shapes; unusual ones fall to the AI path, and even those are repaired and labeled.
Never-worse, proven
The repair pass is guaranteed to only improve or hold the result, verified exhaustively across every fault combination.
Always honestly labeled
Every result says whether it's verified or AI-generated; the confidence score is attributed to its true source.
A score that means something
More problems always lowers the score, and every deduction is named.

One prompt, any cloud

infra god grounds every plan in the target cloud's own services — not a lowest-common-denominator template. Pick a cloud, or ask it to recommend one.

AWS

S3 + CloudFront, ECS/Fargate, Lambda, and RDS — the AWS-native path for your workload, with CloudFormation or CDK.

Azure

Static Web Apps, Container Apps, Front Door, and Azure SQL, mapped to how Azure actually wants it, with Bicep or the CLI.

GCP

Cloud Run, Cloud Storage + Cloud CDN, and Cloud SQL or Firestore, with the matching gcloud commands and Terraform.

Proof, not promises

We ran the same complex multi-tenant SaaS nine times — across AWS, Azure, and GCP, at three experience levels. Every plan is grounded, cited, consistency-checked, and reproducible — and when a check finds a gap, we show it, not hide it.

9/9
consistency PASS — 0 dangling references
9/9
lint PASS
93
citations to official cloud docs (5–14 / run)
8/9
validator PASS — 1 flagged, reported honestly

Real output, cited to the cloud's own docs

RDS PostgreSQL 16, Multi-AZ instance for the 99.9% availability target [Source 1] → docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/Welcome.html

Efficiency & footprint

A grounded deployment guide should cost less compute than the trial-and-error it replaces. Here's how deplovox keeps each run lean — and how we stay honest about what it costs.

Repeat runs reuse the answer

Ask the same thing twice and the second answer is served straight from cache — no additional model compute.

Right-sized models per stage

The small, fast Haiku model handles retrieval, security review, and QA; the larger Sonnet model is reserved for architecture and infrastructure code. Not everything runs on the big model.

Sectioned generation, not regeneration

Infrastructure code is generated in bounded sections, so a fix re-runs one small section instead of regenerating the whole template from scratch.

One grounded run beats many rounds

A single grounded, cited answer replaces a long back-and-forth of chatbot trial-and-error — far fewer total tokens to reach something you can actually deploy.

Every result shows an estimatedcompute footprint — the energy and CO₂e of the model inference that produced it — alongside the exact formula and sources. It's an estimate for transparency, not a measurement and not a marketing claim. Same “use retrieval only when it earns its keep” ethos as our open-source ragornot.

See what it builds

Watch infra god turn three plain-English requests into verified deployment builds — and decline the one it can't guarantee — with every gate, cost line, and citation shown.

Be one of the first 100

The first 100 testers get a complete deployment guide — free, and yours to download. No account, no credit card.

  • A full guide for AWS, Azure, or GCP
  • The exact commands and IaC, not just a diagram
  • One free run per day, always

Limited to the first 100 testers.

Frequently asked questions

How do I deploy a Next.js app on AWS?
Describe your Next.js app to infra god — runtime, database, and expected traffic — and it returns a step-by-step AWS plan. For a static or server-rendered site that usually means an S3 bucket behind CloudFront, or a containerized app on ECS/Fargate, with the exact CLI commands and an infrastructure-as-code template you can apply.
How do I deploy a Next.js app on Azure?
infra god maps the same app to Azure equivalents — Azure Static Web Apps or Container Apps, Azure Front Door for the CDN, and a managed database — and gives you the portal steps plus the Azure CLI commands to provision and ship it.
How do I deploy an app on Google Cloud (GCP)?
For Google Cloud, infra god targets Cloud Run for containers or Cloud Storage with Cloud CDN for static sites, wired to Cloud SQL or Firestore as needed, and hands you the equivalent gcloud commands and Terraform.
Is deplovox free to use?
Yes. Every visitor gets one free deployment guide per day, with no signup required. The first 100 testers get the full guide — architecture, infrastructure-as-code, and the exact commands — free.
Which clouds does infra god support?
AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. infra god grounds each plan in the target cloud's own services rather than a lowest-common-denominator template, so the guide reflects how you would actually build it there.
Can I migrate my app off Vercel, Heroku, or Render to my own cloud?
Yes. Describe your current app — runtime, database, and traffic — and infra god produces a plan to run it on your own AWS, Azure, or GCP account: the architecture, the infrastructure-as-code, and the exact commands. You own the resulting infrastructure and the bill; there's no deplovox runtime to depend on or migrate off later.
Will the deployment plan fit my budget?
infra god right-sizes the architecture to the scale and budget you state — a small app gets a lean, serverless design rather than an over-built one. Every plan includes an estimated monthly infrastructure cost and a cheaper alternative, and if the honest cost is over your budget it says so plainly instead of pretending it fits.